Signing you in

Their lawyers argued that Monday’s order was legally flawed and that no material on record justified either decision.

CJP legal head Ratna Singh said the team had requested an urgent night hearing during the court’s vacation and was awaiting a response from the High Court registry.

“Saurav and Ashutosh should not spend a single minute behind bars. Their liberty must not be curtailed because of political games,” she said.

Das and Ranka were detained on October 13 after allegedly climbing over a locked gate to enter Jantar Mantar, which had been denotified as a designated protest site a day earlier.

The party has been protesting against Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, alleging that the exercise threatens voters’ rights. It has also opposed the denotification of Jantar Mantar.WHAT THE MAGISTRATE SAID

The SEM, South-West District, cited an imminent apprehension of a fresh breach of peace while extending their custody. It said Das and Ranka had deliberately breached bonds furnished on October 11 and immediately committed a breach of peace.

Their assurance that they would not repeat the alleged offence “does not inspire confidence”, the order said.

“Their conduct is not above board; rather, it shows no respect for law and their habitualness in calling protest at de-notified areas,” it stated.

The magistrate said the investigating officer’s application was supported by substantial material raising concerns about a breach of peace and disturbance of public tranquillity. Preventive measures remained necessary, it held.WHY THE SURETIES WERE REJECTED

The SEM examined both sureties after repeated requests from the defence counsel and found them unsuitable.

The other could not provide basic details about Das, including his parentage and address, despite standing as his surety.

The magistrate said neither had established credibility or the ability to ensure the leaders’ appearance before the SEM, a primary purpose of furnishing surety.

With no other sureties available, Das and Ranka were directed to furnish fresh ones and remanded to judicial custody for two more days.WHAT THE DEFENCE ARGUED

During Monday’s proceedings, the lawyers sought the leaders’ immediate release and assured the magistrate that they would not repeat the alleged offence.

They said neither had issued a protest call after October 10 and that both had gone to Jantar Mantar individually.

The SEM rejected those assurances, citing the leaders’ conduct and the investigating officer’s material. It gave them two days to file written submissions and listed further proceedings for October 21.- Ends

Aneesha Mathur is a Special Correspondent for India Today where she puts her LLB degree to use covering Legal issues and cases in the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High court and other courts/tribunals.

Her interest in journalism stems from experience while interning with Legal services and Juvenile justice board as a law student, where she learnt the importance of ensuring that accurate information reaches the world, and that stories about individual experiences and statistics that show a "bigger picture" must supplement each other so other people can see what the large impact of a small thing can be. When not working or thinking about the law and it's state, Aneesha hides from reality in fantasy novels, rom-coms and food.